Friday, July 31, 2009

“Send” the Indigenous, Part 3


So, let’s get down to the nitty-gritty. The only reason I have used the word “send” is because it is such an important word in “Christianese” that most of us understand with regard to missions or with fulfilling the Great Commission.

*Warning! Rabbit trail!*: Along with the word “go.” We understand what is meant by “go” as well as “send.” However, both words are loaded—like so many words used in the subculture of Christianity in America.

Let’s think of some other examples: “Evangelical.” Do people who are in the church have any idea what a nasty word this is to the people on the outside? “Missionary.” Here’s a word that people outside our subculture think of as an invasion force. To them, missionaries destroy the culture and the traditions of entire civilizations, turning the people into Americanized Christian clones. (That’s not a good thing to them, by the way.) Every day the Prime Directive is being violated by well-meaning Christians. *And the rabbit trail ends abruptly before it gets out of hand…*

Okay, back to the theme. The word that is better—the one that I believe we are called to do for the “Next Generation” (another Star Trek reference)—is “empower.”


Empower the indigenous.


Some of you are asking, “Where do Bible school and Seminary fit into the mix?” And I would respond, “Where do we ‘send’ the indigenous to learn the ‘God stuff’ without overwhelming them with the ‘man stuff’?” When you find that place, you let me know, will you?


In the meantime I think we have to mentor while being “reverse mentored.” Treating them and accepting them as equals, we need to come along side the next leaders and allow them to develop their own expressions with very broad, spandex-like boundaries.


If we can control ourselves and give the Holy Spirit room to do his work, I believe that the Church of the future will naturally, organically become more like the New Testament church than it has been since the first century.

2 comments:

Kristi Ostler said...

OK, I'm just going to be honest. Say someone comes to you from another country, befriends you, doesn't work, and just stays with different people. (Mooching in my opinion). They talk about their God and their religion, and they always seem to have money coming in from their home country to cover their costs. So, essentially, their "job" is to convert you, ever so carefully, to their God and beliefs. I'm betting you would lose respect for that person. Those most vulnerable emotionally would be the most receptive.

To me, that is what we are doing as we "send" missionaries to other countries. If you want true respect, wouldn't you be willing to work a job to pay the bills? Isn't that the best way to learn the culture--to live it? I just think that we have the right heart, but we have the wrong method. (However, it's a well accepted method. I think I'm the only person who feels this way.)

Travis Ewton said...

First to Kristi: I agree with your assessment that missionaries who mooch off of their mission field do more harm than good, however your premise is not entirely accurate. There are many missionaries at home and abroad who do work locally, provide much needed services, and advocate for the rights of people.

Now to Jeff: In response to your statement about seminary and college. We assume from history that Jesus did go through full rabbinical training. Probably to gain the respect of others. But, his approach with the disciples was to train them hands on over the course of 3 years and send them out. The disciples then turned around and did the same thing. I think there's a definite OJT precident in scripture.